What is Paco (PACO) Crypto Coin? Complete 2025 Overview
PACO Coin Analysis Tool
Satirical meme cryptocurrency with no real utility or development team.
- Blockchain: PulseChain (primary)
- Total Supply: 949,990,000 PACO
- Token Standard: ERC-20-compatible
- Liquidity: Minimal ($31.59 on PACO/PLS pair)
- Market Cap: ~$17,000
| Token | Market Cap | 24-h Volume | Total Supply | Price (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paco (PACO) | $17K | $0 – $25 | 949,990,000 | $0.000019 |
| Dogecoin (DOGE) | $15.3B | $2.1B | 139B | $0.109 |
| Shiba Inu (SHIB) | $9.8B | $387M | 589T | $0.000016 |
- No development team or governance
- No utility or real-world applications
- Zero liquidity on exchanges
- Confusing ticker symbol conflicts
- No active community or social channels
Key Takeaways
- Paco (PACO) is a meme‑style token created as a joke, with no development team or real utility.
- It has a fixed supply of 949,990,000 PACO and a market cap of roughly $17,000, placing it in the bottom 0.5% of all crypto projects.
- Liquidity is practically non‑existent - 24‑hour trading volume hovers in the single‑digit dollars on the few DEXes that list it.
- The token appears on PulseChain (via PulseX v2) and a confusingly similar version shows up on Solana, creating ticker‑symbol clashes.
- All reputable analysis labels PACO as a dead coin; buying or selling it is virtually impossible and it offers no investment upside.
What is Paco (PACO)?
Paco (PACO) is a satirical meme cryptocurrency that markets itself as “100% penguin‑made, with no humans involved.” The token launched in an anonymous basement experiment and has never disclosed a development team, roadmap, or any functional use case.
The official description on CoinMarketCap (as of 10Oct2025) reads exactly that - a tongue‑in‑cheek project designed purely for entertainment. In short, PACO exists to make people smile, not to power apps or generate returns.
How does the token work? Technical snapshot
Even though PACO is a joke, it still runs on blockchain code. The most commonly referenced implementation lives on the PulseChain network and trades through the PulseX v2 decentralized exchange. A separate, unrelated token claiming the same ticker appears on Solana, but the two share no smart‑contract address or community.
- Blockchain: PulseChain (primary) - an Ethereum‑compatible chain that promises low fees.
- Alternative chain: Solana (minor, confused listing).
- Total supply: 949,990,000 PACO (fully circulating).
- Token standard: ERC‑20‑compatible on PulseChain.
- Liquidity pools: Only PulseX v2 shows any activity, with a $4‑day volume on the PACO/PLS pair.
There is no whitepaper, no audited contract, and no GitHub repository. The smart‑contract address is listed on the PulseX interface, but it has never been verified by an independent auditor.
Current market data (Oct2025)
Because trading is confined to tiny DEX pools, price quotes differ from site to site:
- CoinMarketCap shows $0.00001911 with a $0 24‑hour volume.
- CoinGecko lists $0.00001782 and a $24.50 volume, down 2.05% in the last day.
- CoinCodex reported $0.00002005 on 10Oct2025.
The market cap sits at roughly $17,000, which is less than 0.0001% of the total crypto market. The token’s depth on the PACO/PLS pair is a mere $31.59 at a ±2% price range - meaning a $30 trade can shift the price dramatically.
Comparison with other meme coins
| Token | Market Cap | 24‑h Volume | Total Supply | Price (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paco (PACO) | $17K | $0-$25 | 949,990,000 | $0.000019 |
| Dogecoin (DOGE) | $15.3B | $2.1B | 139B | $0.109 |
| Shiba Inu (SHIB) | $9.8B | $387M | 589T | $0.000016 |
Even the lowest‑priced meme coin (Shiba Inu) has a market cap over 500times larger than PACO and a daily trade volume that dwarfs the entire PACO ecosystem. The comparison makes clear why PACO is called a “dead coin” by the community.
Risks and why experts label it a dead coin
All the red flags line up:
- No team or governance. The coin’s description explicitly says there are “no humans involved.” Without developers, there’s no path to upgrades or bug fixes.
- No utility. It does not power any dApp, DeFi protocol, or payment system. The only use case is “buy Paco a golden fish someday,” which is not a real economic activity.
- Zero liquidity. With daily volume in the single‑digit dollars, you cannot reliably sell even a few dollars worth of PACO without moving the price drastically.
- Fragmented ticker. Three unrelated tokens share the PACO symbol (Paco, Plaza Coin, Paco De Llama). This creates confusion and makes any price data suspect.
- No community. No official Discord, Telegram, or Twitter. The few mentions you find are negative jokes or warnings to stay away.
Crypto analysts from CoinCodex, CoinGecko and independent traders all agree: the token will continue to lose value, and there’s no realistic rebound scenario.
Can you actually buy or sell PACO?
If you try, expect the following:
- Only on PulseX v2. No centralized exchange lists the token.
- Order‑book depth is $30‑ish. Placing a $10 buy order will consume most of the available liquidity, pushing the price up and leaving you with a few hundred‑thousand PACO that you can’t offload.
- High slippage. Even a tiny market‑impact fee can eat away at the tiny amount you’d hope to gain.
Bottom line: unless you’re collecting obscure meme tokens for novelty, there’s no practical way to trade PACO profitably.
Bottom line - should you care about PACO?
If you’re hunting for investment opportunities, the answer is a firm no. The token is a parody, it has zero liquidity, and it carries no functional purpose. For curiosity seekers, you can view the contract on PulseChain explorers and see the “Penguin‑only” description, but treat it as a digital collectible that won’t appreciate.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the ticker PACO stand for?
PACO is simply the chosen symbol for the “Penguin‑made” meme token. It does not represent an acronym or a corporate name.
Is there any official website or team behind PACO?
No. The project has no website, no Telegram, no Discord, and no publicly named developers. All official listings repeat the joke description.
Can I use PACO for payments?
Practically no. No merchant or DeFi platform accepts PACO, and the lack of liquidity means you can’t even move the token reliably.
Why does PACO appear on both PulseChain and Solana?
Different developers independently minted unrelated tokens using the same ticker. The PulseChain version is the one most often referenced, while the Solana variant adds to ticker confusion.
Is there any chance PACO could become valuable?
All available data-zero volume, no roadmap, no community-suggests the token will stay at the bottom of the market. Speculative spikes are unlikely unless a major meme trend artificially inflates it, which would be short‑lived.
19 Comments
They’re probably using PACO to fund secret penguin labs, watch the shadow wallets.
Whoa, this meme‑coin fiasco feels like the apocalypse of crypto hype – everyone’s shouting about “next big thing” while the market rots. I can practically hear the drama in every Discord ping. It’s wild how a token with zero utility can still generate so much chatter. The whole scene just proves we’ve turned finance into a circus.
Honestly, the PACO token is a perfect illustration of why the crypto world needs a moral compass, because here we have a project that offers nothing but a punchline, no development, no accountability, just a fleeting meme. It’s a sham, a joke that masquerades as an investment, and that’s ethically reprehensible. The lack of governance alone is a red flag that should send any decent investor running. We must remember that financial ecosystems thrive on trust, not on anonymous prank tokens.
As an American, I can’t stand seeing our crypto reputation dragged down by a fake penguin token 🇺🇸🚀. This nonsense only fuels the narrative that the US market is a wild west of scams. Let’s keep the flag flying high by staying clear of such dead‑coins!
Alright, let’s break down why PACO should stay firmly in the “do not buy” zone. First, the token has virtually no liquidity – the entire market depth is around $30, meaning any modest trade will swing the price dramatically and leave you holding an illiquid pile. Second, there’s no development team, roadmap, or community support; this isn’t a project that can evolve or fix bugs, it’s a static meme frozen in time. Third, the ticker conflict on multiple chains creates confusion and makes price data unreliable, a classic sign of a poorly managed asset. Fourth, the lack of any real‑world utility means there’s no reason for anyone to use PACO beyond novelty, and novelty rarely translates into sustainable value. Fifth, the market cap is roughly $17 000, a drop in the ocean compared to even the smallest legit tokens, indicating almost no investor interest. Moreover, because it only trades on a tiny DEX pool, you’ll face massive slippage – a $10 purchase could consume most of the pool and push the price up, leaving you with tokens you can’t sell without a massive loss. Additionally, the token’s smart contract has never been audited, opening the door to potential exploits or rug pulls. Finally, the token’s branding as a “penguin‑only” joke signals that the creators never intended serious adoption. All these factors combine to make PACO a textbook example of a dead coin – high risk, zero utility, and no redemption path. If you’re looking for a crypto play, steer clear of this one; stick to projects with clear use‑cases, active development, and measurable liquidity. 🙂
Honestly, I’d say just treat PACO like a digital collectible you might keep for laughs. It’s fun to glance at the contract, but don’t expect any profit. Stay chill and keep your real portfolio solid.
yeah, sounds good but i think you’re overthinking it
no big deal.
From a formal standpoint, the technical specifications are clear, yet informally speaking, who even cares about another meme token? Let’s just move on.
Keep pushing forward, even if it’s just a meme.
👍🏼💰
In the grand tapestry of crypto, PACO is a fleeting stitch; its existence is more poetic than practical. The dramatic flair of a penguin mascot cannot compensate for the stark absence of liquidity. As a dramatist of finance, I see this as a cautionary tale about chasing hype. Let history remember PACO as a footnote, not a chapter.
The philosophical angle here is intriguing – a token that declares "no humans involved" challenges our notions of agency in markets. Yet, without participants, a token cannot function, creating a paradoxical loop. It reminds us that even the most abstract constructs need human stewardship.
The overview does a solid job of laying out the cold facts, but let’s add a layer of context. While the price is minuscule, the token’s illiquidity means any price movement is essentially noise. Comparing it to Dogecoin or Shiba highlights the massive disparity in community support. Investors should weigh the opportunity cost of allocating capital to a dead coin versus more robust projects. In short, PACO is more of a curiosity than an asset.
Well, that’s another classic example of a meme token that never got off the ground. The lack of a team is a huge red flag, and the zero volume proves there’s no real interest. It’s pretty much a waste of time.
If you need a quick way out, avoid PACO entirely – it won’t add any value to a diversified portfolio.
From a cultural perspective, meme coins like PACO reflect the playful side of crypto, but that playfulness shouldn’t be confused with investment merit. It’s a reminder that community sentiment can turn anything into a token, yet not every token deserves a seat at the table.
Sure, it’s a meme but who actually cares.
Totally overhyped, waste of space.
Honestly, the whole discourse around PACO is a bland echo of the larger meme‑coin saturation – a fleeting blip lacking any substantive contribution to blockchain innovation.